Members
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Tracy Robinson on The falsely accused and attorneys who represent them
- Electronic cigarette on Dallas’s Dale Duke: Exonerated of Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
- Conference venue in London on Dallas’s Dale Duke: Exonerated of Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
- Misty on The falsely accused and attorneys who represent them
- Donald on The falsely accused and attorneys who represent them
Archives
Categories
Meta
The Falsely Accused and Attorneys who represent them
This site is dedicated to those who have been falsely accused of some type of child abuse and for the attorneys who represent them.
The National Innocence Project has exonerated, based upon DNA evidence, hundreds of persons who were convicted of atrocious crimes including capital murder and/or rape. A large number of those persons had confessed to crimes they did not commit. Considering that most cases of child abuse do not involve DNA evidence, one can only guess at the number of people in prison that are innocent. The fact that a person has been accused or charged and, possibly, convicted of the crime does not mean that they were guilty of the crime. There are many reasons for this phenomena that are touched upon in this site.
In the large percent of sexual abuse cases, there is no physical evidence or eyewitnesses. Medical exams are routinely “normal”. Yet, people are still convicted based upon a complainant and hearsay/vouching testimony by so-called “experts”. Especially disturbing are the cases where repeated, penile pentration was alleged, yet the medical exam was “normal” with what is considered an “intact” hymen.
In alleged Shaken Baby and other alleged physical abuse cases, there is seldom a search for an “equally competing hypothesis” for causation of any injuries. In most cases, the presumption is made that the injurie(s) were non-accidental and therefore must have been inflicted by someone. What is not commonly known is that in many of these cases, there is a gigantic dispute among medical experts as to whether a particular injury was accidental versus non-accidental or whether there is some non-abusive cause of the condition or injury.
The search for the truth regarding a child abuse allegation involves “The Law, the Science, the Myths, the Reality”. No one wants a guilty child abuser to go unpunished. On the other hand, there is a sentiment in the general public that it is “better to err on the side of safety” which translates into that “it is better to convict 10 innocent people to make sure we get the one guilty person”. That is, unless they are the person accused or a family member or friend.
Justice can be served when people educate themselves on the issues involved and let reason, rather than emotion, rule the day. We seek justice not only for real victims, but for those who have been ajudged a child abuser when they have not abused anyone.
Recent Entries
NCADRC 2012 Conference
February 28, 2012
Child Abuse Allegations: The Law, The Science, The Myths, The Reality, September 6 -8, 2012, Ballys Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada Click on “Conference” tab above for more information
Divorce/Custody Proceedings + Child Molestation Proceedings= False Convictions
November 22, 2011
Studies show that the majority of child Sexual Molestation accusations that are claimed in child custody disputes are false. Look at this article/blog for the studies. Think about it, it makes sense. If you are desperate to keep your children, [...]
Dallas’s Dale Duke: Exonerated of Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
November 15, 2011
In 1992, Dale Duke was recently married, when his step-daughter accused him of Sexual Assault. Duke pled no contest to the charge in order to receive a deferred adjudication, and was later sentenced to 20 years prison for refusing to [...]